Okay, I understand the structure of your statement now. It seems you’re making a comment about a set of videos, likely related to the topic of baby monkeys and their relationships. Let’s break down your statement:
“MG., Best Video Ever-The middle one is other type | Babies monkeys build very strong relationships.”
Here’s a breakdown:
- “MG.,”: Again, likely initials or shorthand, possibly a person’s name or an identifier you’re using.
- “Best Video Ever-“: This is a strong declaration of preference. You’re stating that one of the videos you’ve seen (or are referencing) is the absolute best. The dash might be used to introduce the subject of the videos.
- “The middle one is other type”: This is the key part that introduces a distinction between the videos.
- “The middle one”: This implies you are referring to a collection or sequence of videos, and you are specifically pointing out the video in the middle.
- “is other type”: This means the middle video is different from the others in the collection. It belongs to a different category, style, or subject matter than the rest.
- “| Babies monkeys build very strong relationships.”: This part provides the overall theme or subject matter of the videos you are discussing. The pipe symbol “|” is often used to separate different pieces of information or clauses. This tells me that the videos, or at least the ones that are not the “other type” in the middle, are about baby monkeys and their strong relationships.
Putting it together, your statement means:
“MG, I’ve seen some videos, and the best one is related to the topic of baby monkeys building strong relationships. However, the video in the middle of this collection is different; it’s not about baby monkeys or their relationships.”
Possible Scenarios and Interpretations:
- Scenario 1: You’re watching a playlist or a series of videos. You’ve found a playlist of videos about baby monkeys and their relationships. You love the overall theme, but the video in the middle of this playlist is something completely unrelated (e.g., a video about cars, cooking, or something else entirely). You’re highlighting this difference and still calling the overall theme (or perhaps one of the baby monkey videos) the “Best Video Ever.”
- Scenario 2: You’re comparing different videos you’ve seen. You’ve watched several videos. Some are about baby monkeys and their strong relationships, and you find those to be the “Best Video Ever.” You’re also mentioning a specific video you saw that was in the “middle” of your viewing experience (perhaps chronologically or mentally), and that video was of a different type than the baby monkey videos.
In essence, you’re highlighting a contrast within a set of videos. You really enjoy the videos about baby monkeys and their relationships, but you’ve noticed that one of the videos (specifically the middle one) doesn’t fit with that theme.
It’s interesting that you call one of the baby monkey videos the “Best Video Ever” while also pointing out the outlier. This suggests you have a strong appreciation for the subject matter of baby monkeys and their relationships.
Do you have any more details about these videos or why you consider the baby monkey videos the “Best Video Ever”? I’d be happy to discuss it further!
